The term
“sea change” can be used to describe a great shift in thinking. I like it better than the over-used term
“paradigm shift” because it comes from Shakespeare’s The Tempest (at least according to Wikipedia's entry). As a high school English teacher, I may have
just offended some of my colleagues here and at other schools. I have a feeling there are quite a few in our
field who are put off by referring to both Shakespeare and Wikipedia in the
same sentence. But ignoring the
importance and relevance of Wikipedia is akin to ignoring a revolution that is
no longer knocking at the door, but is in your living room, sitting on your
sofa, drinking your Diet Coke. There’s a
word that describes the teacher who with a firm edict declares that no student
be permitted to use Wikipedia as a source:
hypocrite. Everyone uses
Wikipedia. Really. Whether it is to
quickly look up who uttered the famous quote about climbing Mt. Everest “Because
it’s there” (not Sir Edmund Hillary, by the way) or to double-check the
spelling of Faulkner’s Yoknapatawpha County, teachers use Wikipedia, so why
shouldn’t students?
The
all-too-easy counter argument is that any fool can edit Wikipedia and therefore
Wikipedia is not credible. The simplicity of this argument, however, belies its
sincerity. Just because the way we collect
and disseminate information is changing, is no reason to dismiss the whole of
the information out of hand. Evaluating the credibility of sources is one of
the most important skills our students need for the 21st Century,
and the hard truth is it’s not a black and white issue. In fact, evaluating sources is time consuming
and difficult—for students and for teachers.
Perhaps it is this difficulty that causes some teachers to outlaw Wikipedia. But the old days of combing through yellowed
literary journals and the (mercifully brief) era of manipulating microfiche
transparencies on a machine in the back corner of the library have come to an
end. Information is now easy to find—and
in the wonderful way of inverse equations—harder to winnow.
Thank you for this, Betsy! I was of the camp of "No Wikipedia" but I too, felt like a hypocrite. "No, don't cite it, but go there to look stuff up". I think that it might actually be a great learning tool to show where and when we should be citing information, and what sorts of alarm bells should be going off in our heads when we see a statement that SHOULD be cited, but isn't.
ReplyDelete